STUDI PERBANDINGAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA ADMINTRASI NEGARA DI INDONESIA DAN AMERIKA

Abstract

The settlement of state administrative disputes is important in the government system, this is to avoid injustice that can lead to conflicts between citizens or civil legal entities against the decisions of state institutions, so a mechanism for resolving state administrative disputes is needed, so the purpose of this study is to determine and analyze the comparison of the forms of administrative dispute resolution arrangements based on legislation in Indonesia and America. This research method uses normative research, namely research that examines positive legal norms in the form of laws and regulations. Researchers try to obtain legal materials and information from sources that are reliable and can be accounted for using a comparative legal approach and conceptual approach. The results of this study are, the resolution of state administrative disputes in Indonesia and America is carried out by the stages of internal settlement of the institution/agency, and the stages of the state administrative court, because the internal settlement of the institution is more efficient and faster because it is resolved by mediation, negotiation. This makes the process of resolving state administrative disputes faster and more transparent.